logo
logo
  • Home
  • What is PAW?
  • Concepts
    • Positive Emotions
    • Behaviour
    • Happiness
    • Quality of Life
    • Questions & Answers
  • Research
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
LIFT logo of farm animals

LIFT

Rat Tickling

Pig playing with straw

iPAW

QBA

  • Home
  • What is PAW?
  • Concepts
    • Positive Emotions
    • Behaviour
    • Happiness
    • Quality of Life
    • Questions & Answers
  • Research
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

© Copyright Positive Animal Welfare. All rights reserved. | Privacy notice, GDPR & cookies

Website concept and content collated by scientists at SRUC (Scotland’s Rural College).

This work is supported by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS SRUC-A3-6).

Website developed and supported by new(mediabureau)

Margit Bak Jensen, LIFT Action Chair

COST ACTION link

 

Lawrence, A. B., Vigors, B., & Sandøe, P. (2019). What Is so Positive about Positive Animal Welfare?—A Critical Review of the Literature. Animals, 9(10), 783.

DOI

FAWC (2009). Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. FAWC, 17 Smith Square, London.

Farm Animal Welfare Council, UK

Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: “liking”, “wanting”, and learning. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 9(1), 65–73.

DOI

Byrne, R. W. (2015). The what as well as the why of animal fun. Current Biology, 25(1), R2–R4.

DOI

Vere, A. J. de, & Kuczaj, S. A. (2016). Where are we in the study of animal emotions? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(5), 354–362.

DOI

Yeates, J. W., & Main, D. C. J. (2008). Assessment of positive welfare: A review. The Veterinary Journal, 175(3), 293–300.

DOI

Webb, L. E., Veenhoven, R., Harfeld, J., & Jensen, M. (2018). What is animal happiness? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

DOI

Sandøe, P., 1999. “Quality of life – three competing views,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2(1), pp. 11–23.

DOI

Appleby, M. C., & Sandøe, P. (2002). Philosophical debate on the nature of well-being: Implications for animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 11, 283–294.

DOI

Rowe, E., & Mullan, S. (2022). Advancing a “Good Life’’ for Farm Animals: Development of Resource Tier Frameworks for On-Farm Assessment of Positive Welfare for Beef Cattle, Broiler Chicken and Pigs. ANIMALS, 12(5), 565.

DOI

Fredrickson, B. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377.

DOI

Mendl, M., & Paul, E. S. (2020). Animal affect and decision-making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 144–163.

DOI

Edgar, J. L., Mullan, S. M., Pritchard, J. C., McFarlane, U. J., & Main, D. C. (2013). Towards a ‘Good Life’ for Farm Animals: Development of a Resource Tier Framework to Achieve Positive Welfare for Laying Hens. Animals, 3(3), 584–605.

DOI

Skevington, S. M., & Böhnke, J. R. (2018). How is subjective well-being related to quality of life? Do we need two concepts and both measures? Social Science & Medicine, 206(Int. J. Meth. Psychiatr. Res. 20 1 2011), 22–30.

DOI

Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959). The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen.

Link out

Turner, P. V. (2020). Moving Beyond the Absence of Pain and Distress: Focusing on Positive Animal Welfare. ILAR Journal.

DOI

Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2001). Tickling induces reward in adolescent rats. Physiology & Behavior, 72(1–2), 167–173.

DOI

Bombail, V. et al. (2021). Crying With Laughter: Adapting the Tickling Protocol to Address Individual Differences Among Rats in Their Response to Playful Handling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 677872.

DOI

Bombail, V., et al. (2022). Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats. F1000Research, 11, 1053.

DOI

Pellis, S. and Pellis, V. (2013). The playful brain: venturing to the limits of neuroscience. Simon and Schuster.

ISBN13: 9781780744629

Cloutier, S. et al. (2018). Tickling, a technique for inducing positive affect when handling rats. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), (135), p.e57190.

DOI

Bombail, V. et al. 2019. Odour conditioning of positive affective states: rats can learn to associate an odour with being tickled. PLoS One, 14(6), p.e0212829.

DOI

van de Weerd, H. & Ison, S. (2019). Providing Effective Environmental Enrichment to Pigs: How Far Have We Come? ANIMALS, 9(5), 254.

DOI

Kempermann, G. (2019). Environmental enrichment, new neurons and the neurobiology of individuality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20, pages235–245.

DOI

Newberry, R.C., (1995). Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44(2-4), pp.229-243.

DOI

Report of the Technical Committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Chairman: Professor F. W. Rogers Brambell. Cmnd. 2836, December 3 1965. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London. Referred to hereafter as the Brambell report.

Mellor, D. (2014). Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(1), 3–8.

DOI

Fraser, D., & Duncan, I. (1998). “Pleasures”, “Pains” and Animal Welfare: Toward a Natural History of Affect. Animal Welfare, 7, 383–396.

DOI

Wemelsfelder F., Hunter T.E.A., Mendl M.T., Lawrence A.B. (2001). Assessing the ‘whole animal’: A free choice profiling approach. Anim. Behav. 2001;62: 209–220.

DOI

 

Fleming, P.A., Clarke, T., Wickham, S.L., Stockman, C.A., Barnes, A.L., Collins, T. and Miller, D.W., (2016). The contribution of qualitative behavioural assessment to appraisal of livestock welfare. Animal Production Science, 56(10): 1569-1578.

DOI

 

Wemelsfelder, F. 2007. How animals communicate quality of life: the qualitative assessment of animal behaviour. Anim. Welf. 16(S) 25-31.

DOI

 

Keeling, L., Evans, A., Forkman, B., Kjaernes, U. (2013). Welfare Quality® principles and criteria. Wageningen Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands.

DOI

 

Des Roches et al. (2018). Dairy cows under experimentally-induced Escherichia coli mastitis show negative emotional states assessed through Qualitative Behaviour Assessment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.  206, pp.1-11.

DOI

 

Shaw, N., Wemelsfelder, F., Riley, L. (2022). Bark to the future: The welfare of domestic dogs during interaction with a positively reinforcing artificial agent. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 249, 105595.

DOI

 

Cooper, R., Wemelsfelder, F. (2020). Qualitative Behaviour Assessment as an indicator of animal emotional welfare in farm assurance. Livestock 25 (4), 2-5.

DOI

 

Vigors, B., Sandøe, P., & Lawrence, A. B. (2021). Positive Welfare in Science and Society: Differences, Similarities and Synergies. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2, 738193.

DOI

 

Lawrence, A. B., Vigors, B., & Sandøe, P. (2019). What Is so Positive about Positive Animal Welfare?—A Critical Review of the Literature. Animals, 9(10), 783.

DOI

Rault, J.L., Hintze, S., Camerlink, I. and Yee, J.R., 2020. Positive welfare and the like: distinct views and a proposed framework. Frontiers in veterinary science,

DOI

 

Rault, J.L., Hintze, S., Camerlink, I. and Yee, J.R., 2020. Positive welfare and the like: distinct views and a proposed framework. Frontiers in veterinary science

DOI

 

Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (1985). The ontogeny of locomotor play behaviour in the domestic cat. Anim. Behav. 33(2), 502–510.

DOI